Tuesday, April 21, 2015

Technology Assignment

There is new technology being produced every month, and with that there is bound to be something cool that shows itself. Everyone pretty much knows a little bit about facial recognition. It is most commonly used by Federal Agents to track down criminals. Well now there is a new use for it that is being developed by Google.
Imagine this scene. You are in a location where you think you might know a person, but you are too shy to go up and talk to them. You take out your phone and move it from one side of the room to the other scanning the faces of everyone. The next thing you know, you have all of their social media information that pops up on your screen. Now you can determine if you know the person or not.
Right now facial recognition is still in the “Developing stages.” When you take pictures on your phone or camera it has the capability to recognize certain features to know that what is being focused on is a face. What it can’t do yet is tell you to whom the face belongs to.
Can you imagine a future where you point your phone in the direction of a person and it pulls up their entire profile on some social media platform? Personally, I have two thoughts on that:
  • The ultimate stalker will be born
  •         The ease at which people can learn about someone else will make our society even more lazy
For my first thought of the ultimate stalker being born is technology like this will allow a person to sit down anywhere and gather information on another. If that isn’t creepy to you I don’t know what is. Also it dives into the world of personal privacy being breached. And it also brings up the ethical issue of is right for someone to gather data from you without your knowledge.
I think in our society we are already heading in a direction where people are more prone to be less social with others. So the ease at which people can learn about someone else will take the amount of laziness to the next level.
Now with all of that being said, I think there is some good that can come out of this as long as people use this technology in the proper way. One way this could be good is that by looking up someone’s profile it can give a person the opportunity to find out likes and dislikes, so they can go approach a person and have something to talk about.
Will this technology be available to the public in the next five years? The best answer to that is no, but companies are making strides to one day be able to get there. I hope that when that day comes people are still willing to talk to others face to face.


http://mashable.com/2009/06/01/social-media-future-tech/

Monday, April 13, 2015

Apps

Social Media Applications can function in two ways, ensuring anonymity or forcing an association to your real identity. Both of these functions are necessary for the establishment of an open dialogue. Facebook is the prime example of forcing users to operate from a actual identity. This is in part out of a belief that individuals will be more civil if they are held accountable by people they know. People used to attempt to have different personalities or identities depending on who they were around, Facebook essentially tried to end this. However what has actually happened is a proliferation of individuals are increasingly competitive in their desire to do more than their friends. This belief about individuals behaving civilly if they are coupled with their name has not been proven empirically. Any user of Facebook can testify that individuals, or trolls, are constantly seeking to start an argument.
Some social media apps have been bucking the current norm of not betting against Facebook, and have allowed users to interact anonymity. Apps such as Yik-Yak, Whisper and Secret all allow users to not couple their comments with a name and identity. This has had mixed results. Some individuals have a tendency to seek conflict and to destroy the emotional stability of others. However this is not always the case. There are stories of people rallying behind those who voice thinking of suicide, of showing up to be blood tested for someone’s mother with leukemia, and simply giving shout outs to others  almost always positive. Anonymous social media apps are increasingly used as individuals seek to voice sincere concerns and questions. Although responses are not always positive, it is suprising how often they are.  These examples speak to something more important than which social media app is used, they speak to the character of the individuals that are on them.
The Ring of Gyges is a object from Plato’s Republic which grants the wearer invisibility. Socrates then asks the question of whether an individual’s behavior would change. He was optimistic that because we feel good when we do good, eventually people would start to behave in way beneficial to society. The truth of this belief is something with mixed anecdotal evidence. Anonymous social media does have individuals that seek conflict, but that is not always the case. And maybe the cause isn’t the anonymous social media apps but rather is our character. Blaming social media apps for people’s actions is inappropriate.   


Tuesday, April 7, 2015

Viral Videos

Viral Videos

Here is something that I am pretty positive everyone is curious to know about: viral videos. I have always wanted to know what makes a video go “viral,” the money that can be gained from it and many other things.  First, let us figure what a viral video is. According to Techopedia, my first article, a viral video is defined as any clip of animation or film that is spread rapidly through online sharing. Reading what a viral video is defined I learned I was completely wrong in what these are. I thought there had to be a certain number of times the video is viewed in a given time span. As it turns out most videos that go viral fall into one of three categories: unintentional, humorous, and promotional.

Something that is very common now-a-days is the rate at which viral videos pop up. Now that most mobile devices include a video camera, and a vast amount of people have video sharing capabilities a viral video is created pretty much daily. It is crazy to think that not even ten years ago if a video went viral it was pretty much a one way ticket to stardom.  During that time viral videos were a rare sight to watch and I feel often times it was the media that catapulted videos to the next level. One of the most well-known videos and most viewed on YouTube is Gangnam Style. I bet you are wondering how did a video that, 1: not American made, and 2: not even spoken in English, become the most watched video in the world? I was curious to find out so I went and did some research on how to create a viral video. What I found were some guidelines to follow:                                                        
1.       No need to have expensive equipment
2.       Make your videos for fun, not money
3.       Keep your videos short
4.       Keep your expectations in check


I think one of the reasons why Gangnam Style song was such a big hit with the world is it followed step two in the guideline. A person could tell that the artist was purely having fun with music making.  The guideline I find fascinating is the first one in that you don’t need fancy equipment to make a viral hit. To me it seems like common sense, yet people still go and spend thousands on special equipment to help them achieve their stardom. Now, if you will excuse me I have to go off and create my own viral video using my cell phone!





Thursday, April 2, 2015

Fastest Way To Topple Governments

Social Media Case Reflection #2: Arab Spring
The Arab Spring was a series of anti-government protests, uprisings and armed rebellions that spread across the Middle East in early 2011. The use of social media platforms played a pivotal role in the organization of many protests across the Arab Nations. This post will focus on the uses of social media in how it made much of the protest possible.

It is amazing how only a few decades ago if people wanted to get to get together to protest it would take months of planning. There would be numerous phone calls made, people having to write newspaper ads etc. I think we all know that can take forever to achieve your goal especially when it involves other countries coming together for a common goal. That is where social media comes in. Social media bridged the gap in time. Before I continue I want to use a quote from an Egyptian Activist named Wael Ghonim.  This quote will set up everything I talk about. He said “If you want to liberate a people, give them the Internet.” I think that quote speaks volumes into the protests for numerous reasons. One being, having the internet allows for quick assembly and in the case of Arab Springs the governments could not control the content that was being exposed.

In one of the articles I read, it was discussed the extent to which people would go to show their defiance against the regime. This is also where I think the use of social media might have gone too far. The one that caught my eye was of a citizen of Sidi Bouzid by the name of Mohammed Bouaziz set himself on fire, and then his desperate act of defiance was posted on Facebook and YouTube. The problem with such heinous act posted on to social media platforms is anyone and everyone has the ability to watch it, including children. This is can also be thought of as a con of the protests because there might have been followers who were against violent acts. Personally, if I was part of a protest that was supposed to be non-violent I would lose my interest when I saw someone setting themselves on fire. To display the power social media has, president Hosni Mubarak was forced out of his office because of 5.5% of his population, were able to connect through social media. The 5.5% may seem like a small number to overthrow a president, but that percentage translates into about 6 million people! There is no way that many people would have been able to band together without the aid of social media. In this particular case Facebook was the platform of choice.

There were some big ethical issues that were taking place during this time. Some governments tried to control local and foreign information and support for the protestors by creating Internet blackouts. To fight this Google and Twitter offered a service they called “Speak-2-Tweet.” This is where I feel some rules of ethics were broken. I think it was unethical for Twitter and Google to bypass a country’s control on something so that others could know what is going on. I look at it this way; if there were a problem within my family that was going on, I would want to keep it within my family as to keep others from trying to put their two cents in on the matter.  I kind of feel that is what happened in this country. There was a clear issue and the government wanted to keep the problem within its country and not have outsiders attempting to fight a battle that is not theirs.

You all have probably heard the phrase “the pen is mightier than the sword.” Well I would like to introduce you to the new type of pen and its name is Social Media. It is scary how powerful social media can be when used properly. It blows my mind to think that such platforms have the ability to overthrow dictatorships and topple governments. There are definite downsides to using social media as a weapon of information, and at the same time it is a good thing to have when trying to bring massive groups of people together.